My thoughts on all energy sources, in no particular order.


Coal : Wasteful, and causes pollution. Do not use
Oil : Second verse, same as the first.
Nuclear power : In-efficient in its present state. We cause nuclear reactions to... boil water for a turbine. No.Guess what this is how most power stations work, burning a material to heat water, make steam, turn turbine
What I meant was there is light, and radiation emitted, which is tens of thousands of times more energy, than is produced as heat by nuclear power, and that we have no way to harness the radiation itself, which is exponentially greater than the heat, per volume of power-cell, in any given reaction.

Solar power : In its present state, no, its in-efficient. In the form of a solar net in space, fudge yes.
Hydro-power: Useful, but is not a constant. Requires vast resources, for little result. NoYes, water runs out, no constant there. I simply meant the materials to build a hydro electric dam, takes a large amount of resources, and it takes up to 20 years to earn back the monetary value of said materials.

Tidal power : Doesn't work, more energy is required to start, than what is gained. No. Because tides run out before they pay for the power station
Tidal power is boats which capture each wave, to turn a turbine, and power batteries, which are then brought back to land. it's a very stupid, expensive, and wasteful idea, since it takes more energy to do, than what is gained.

Geothermal power : Perfect power source, assuming there is never an earthquake. Maybe.Because it's no problem at all to drill down 5 miles anywhere where power is needed Geothermal energy, will last for 20,000 years after the sun burns out, and 1 hour of geothermal energy, is enough to power the planet, for a week, assuming we harness its maximum gain (IE additional heat from the sun per hour)

Wind Energy: Only good in the plains. Did you know that in wind energy capturing, the electric company purposely waste +60% of the energy by adding breaks to prevent the fans from getting +X RPMs, simply to not 'over-produce'?Why the actual fudge would they waste power when they are still producing below demand.
first of all, the link that was posted, is one reason.
The second is, the wires can only hold X voltage, or they will burn out, try to run a current through steel wool, it just burns up, try to run 10,000 volts at 9 amps, through the wire in a pair of headphones. the result, fire and red-hot metal.
the 3rd reason, is that under producing wind power, requires more power from other sources, such as coal, oil, and nuclear power, which costs US MORE, and creates a massive profit for those providing fuel. It all boils down to 'fuel based economy can't have natural or free energy because there's no profit'

Tesla's Lightning capture (Huge lightning rod that captures the current in the clouds) 100% useful, all specific information, blueprints, and working models, destroyed and/or classified by the US Government, because they don't want free energy.METAL POLE. Also where do you get your constant course of lighting from?
There are hundreds, of MILLIONS of volts, in the form of electro-static currents, CONSTANTLY drifting in the the lower atmosphere, the earths rotation generates static, from friction with the air itself. put a highly conductive rod, that extends to, i'm not sure how high, i'd guess troposphere, but anyway, the static in the atmosphere is then grounded by this rod, and as science has shown, electricity, will move through miles of wire, against circuits, before it moves through an inch of air, therefor, this rod only needs a break in it, and use the top, and the ground, as + and -.

Magnet wheels: used in science fiction, consists of a wheel of magnets, inside another wheel of magnets, that oppose and repel, making the inner wheel spin. The inner wheel will achieve the terminal velocity of the environment it is in, In a vacuum, with no-resistance, would approach the speed of light. feasible to start, output would only rise, unfortunately, If it goes to fast, it would burn out all wires, and, once started, it could not be stopped, without devastation. My preferred energy source.You prefer something that risky? Also how do we bring this energy down from space?
Not in space, in a large Hyperbaric Chamber. it wouldn't be that hard, you just have to control the speed by controlling the air-pressure and resistance .... it isn't a giant space-wheel, that would be just stupid..

Tidal power is basically like a wind turbine in water, turned by the tide moving in and out, generating power with a dynamo.

Would those bobbing wave generators be lumped into tidal power? Them and the snakey ones.