View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jun 07, 2024 1:17 am



Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 Pokemon Monochrome 
Author Message
Loose Canon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 2992
Location: --------------->
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Well, Platinum is considered valuable like Diamonds and Pearls, so...
Yeah, iunno. But there are better things to argue about than the names of the games.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:06 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:46 pm
Posts: 5212
Location: The Grills Locker.
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Tokochiro wrote:
The one from last year were the weird as hell pearl and platinum.


I only said I played it last year, not necessarily that it came out last year.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:26 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:23 am
Posts: 213
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow of public acceptance.
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
TorrentHKU wrote:
Well, Platinum is considered valuable like Diamonds and Pearls, so...
Yeah, iunno. But there are better things to argue about than the names of the games.


Good point. I suppose the old adage "don't judge a book by it's cover" could play nicely here.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:34 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:06 am
Posts: 1294
Location: Comox, BC, Canada
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
RBY were the best. I still have the carts.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:00 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:57 am
Posts: 4886
Location: some compy
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Jackal wrote:
Yes, the whole "plot" concept is fairly new to Nintendo
You do realise that the pokemon games aren't the only ones produced for nintendo, nor are they even made by a first-party development studio, right? They're made by game freak, a second-party studio (they work alongside Nintendo and have a pile of contracts with them but aren't actually owned by them).
Note that I'm not disagreeing with your suggestion that the pokemon games are pretty formulaic, just that you're blaming Nintendo for it.
[/pointless]
alphagamer774 wrote:
RBY were the best. I still have the carts.
I also still have my GB/GBC carts, but I disagree that they were the best. Did you read the link I posted a page back outlining exactly why I feel that they weren't the best?


Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:04 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 3032
Location: Somewhere in the universe
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
So uh i hear 3v3 battle sin B&W, is this true?


Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:14 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:26 am
Posts: 1633
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Emerald was clearly the best game in the series.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:16 am
Profile
DRL Developer
DRL Developer

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 4107
Location: Russia
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
The thing with the fourth gen is that, at that moment is when progress halted for the games.
There isn't a single new major thing I can mention from it. Even if the underground fossil digging is pretty fun, it's just a minigame essentially.

And yeah, I agree with you there Geti, 3D realtime battles would've been hella fun.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:15 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:23 am
Posts: 213
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow of public acceptance.
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Geti wrote:
You do realise that the pokemon games aren't the only ones produced for nintendo, nor are they even made by a first-party development studio, right? They're made by game freak, a second-party studio (they work alongside Nintendo and have a pile of contracts with them but aren't actually owned by them).
Note that I'm not disagreeing with your suggestion that the pokemon games are pretty formulaic, just that you're blaming Nintendo for it.
[/pointless]


I was under the impression that Game Freak was the publisher :oops:

Also, I realize that Nintendo doesn't only make Pokemon...who else could be responsible for Link, Kirby, Kid Icarus, etc? I agree, they aren't completely responsible for the cookie-cutter story lines in Pokemon games, since Game Freak helps out as well. My bad.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:57 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:29 pm
Posts: 73
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Contrary wrote:
I played Emerald and loved the crap out of that. I got Pearl after? Actually I'm not sure. Some DS one. I'd play Pokemon if it were possible to get to the high end multiplayer metagame without grinding to hell.

Yeah, I loved Emerald too, but then the franchise went down the shitter, if you ask me.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:19 pm
Profile
Data Realms Elite
Data Realms Elite
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:27 pm
Posts: 4521
Location: Constant motion
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
I've played White, blue and yellow, and bought FireRed, Emerald, Pearl, Platinum and HeartGold.

Never found one I didn't like. I'm too lazy to even spend half an hour training, so I just spam legendaries.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:26 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:23 am
Posts: 213
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow of public acceptance.
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
All-in-all, Pokemon is the best children-friendly, turn-based, time-consuming role-playing game that you can find. Besides the Final Fantasies, of course.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:36 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:06 am
Posts: 1294
Location: Comox, BC, Canada
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Geti wrote:
Jackal wrote:
Yes, the whole "plot" concept is fairly new to Nintendo
You do realise that the pokemon games aren't the only ones produced for nintendo, nor are they even made by a first-party development studio, right? They're made by game freak, a second-party studio (they work alongside Nintendo and have a pile of contracts with them but aren't actually owned by them).
Note that I'm not disagreeing with your suggestion that the pokemon games are pretty formulaic, just that you're blaming Nintendo for it.
[/pointless]
alphagamer774 wrote:
RBY were the best. I still have the carts.
I also still have my GB/GBC carts, but I disagree that they were the best. Did you read the link I posted a page back outlining exactly why I feel that they weren't the best?


Having read your link now, I sorta agree with you. I like R/B/Y for nostalgic reasons, but the new games have a nice look too. They're a fantastic step forward for nintendo, mostly because there's an actual change. surprising, isn't it. Especialy diamond/pearl.


Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:52 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 3032
Location: Somewhere in the universe
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Well my friend confirmed 3v3 battles.
Time to spell inappropriate/troll words using unown. :D


Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:44 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:23 am
Posts: 213
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow of public acceptance.
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pokemon Monochrome
Yeah, the three-on-three battles are a lot of fun. Now they just need to add three-team battles.


Thu Mar 17, 2011 1:35 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
[ Time : 0.019s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]