Author |
Message |
venn177
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
RAN_DOM wrote: Vista basic has less features than XP. And Vista spies on you. But Vista Premium is still = to XP. No, I have Vista Home Premium and after you customize the hell out of it it's 100 times better than XP, especially with the addition of DirectX 10, just so you can say that you have it.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 3:45 am |
|
 |
whitty
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:31 am Posts: 2982 Location: Texas
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
Striker26 wrote: you can make it so it doesn't have to ask for permission you know how? i have been an admin but it still asks. what did you guys do?
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:16 am |
|
 |
cambiogris
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:32 pm Posts: 830
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
whitty wrote: how? i have been an admin but it still asks. what did you guys do? Flat-out disable it. Not the best thing for security, but you're not any worse than you would be with XP.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:32 am |
|
 |
whitty
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:31 am Posts: 2982 Location: Texas
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
i use limewire a lot. im not gonna disable it.
dont lock and say something gay like "locked fro the discussion of warez"
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:35 am |
|
 |
ProjektTHOR
Banned
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:05 pm Posts: 2527
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
talking about applications is not against the rules.
talking about the execution of warez, the hunt for warez, what warez you use, and such is against the rules.
Maybe you should consider whining less, whitty. Its not the moderating staffs fault you dont know how to obey rules.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:36 am |
|
 |
venn177
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
ProjektTHOR wrote: talking about applications is not against the rules.
talking about the execution of warez, the hunt for warez, what warez you use, and such is against the rules.
Maybe you should consider whining less, whitty. Its not the moderating staffs fault you dont know how to obey rules. Thank you for not locking thread and such. Please put in your input on this subject, oh THOR.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:39 am |
|
 |
ProjektTHOR
Banned
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:05 pm Posts: 2527
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
Windows in general is ♥♥♥♥ retarded.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:40 am |
|
 |
venn177
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
ProjektTHOR wrote: Windows in general is **** retarded. Linux-user, eh?
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:42 am |
|
 |
cambiogris
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:32 pm Posts: 830
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
whitty wrote: i use limewire a lot. im not gonna disable it.
dont lock and say something gay like "locked fro the discussion of warez" Make sure you're running a good antivirus as well.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:48 am |
|
 |
whitty
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:31 am Posts: 2982 Location: Texas
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
McAffe security Center, custimized to my every need  anyway about this thread, people are just gonna say that XP or Vista is better because thats the one they have. personally, ive been using XP for about 4-5 years, and Vista for only a few months, and i like vista way better.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 5:53 am |
|
 |
venn177
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:35 am Posts: 3778 Location: Largo, Florida
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
whitty wrote: McAffe security Center, custimized to my every need  anyway about this thread, people are just gonna say that XP or Vista is better because thats the one they have. personally, ive been using XP for about 4-5 years, and Vista for only a few months, and i like vista way better. Amen. It's really about whatever you have and such.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:00 am |
|
 |
Lord Tim
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:55 pm Posts: 1178 Location: America!
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
As long as you have anti-virus, whats wrong with disabling the UAC? (Thing that asks you) It's not like it takes away anything that XP had. You'll still have just as much security. And if you're not a complete retard, you won't get viruses anyways.
Complaining about Vista asking you to do everything is not a valid arguement against Vista.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:17 am |
|
 |
Shade
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:22 pm Posts: 493
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
ProjektTHOR wrote: Windows in general is **** retarded. It's pretty much the only operating system league out there that's meant for gaming.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:08 pm |
|
 |
ProjektTHOR
Banned
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:05 pm Posts: 2527
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
Thats nice. Its not an operating system "meant for gaming."
There is nothing about Windows that makes it "for gaming," besides the fact that its the only operating systme popular enough to warrant spending billions of dollars and millions of man-hours of development time creating applications.
There is nothing special about Windows that makes it a better operating system for games besides its market penetration.
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:30 pm |
|
 |
cambiogris
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:32 pm Posts: 830
|
 Re: Vista vs. XP
I guess as technical evidence, some games have been known to get better FPS on Linux under WINE (!) than XP, on the same system. So yeah, it's all about the marketshare. 
|
Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:46 pm |
|
 |
|